There is a document sitting on Kingston Council's website right now that will determine where homes get built, how tall new towers can rise, whether green belt land gets released, and how much your neighbourhood changes over the next 15 years. It is called the Regulation 19 Local Plan, and the window for residents to formally challenge it is open right now.
Once it passes inspection, every planning application in the Royal Borough will be assessed against it. Developers will cite it. Councillors will defer to it. Planning officers will enforce it. This is not a consultation about a single development — it is the rulebook itself.
If you live, work, or own property in Kingston upon Thames, this is the most consequential planning document you will encounter for a generation.
The planning system in England requires each local authority to produce a Local Plan — a blueprint for development in their area. Before it can become official policy, the plan must go through a formal public consultation under Regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012.
This is the final public stage before the plan is submitted to the Planning Inspectorate for independent examination. After submission, an appointed Inspector scrutinises the plan and holds public hearings. If the Inspector finds it is not "sound" — legally compliant, justified, effective, and consistent with national policy — the council may have to make changes or, in the worst case, start again.
Critically, at the Regulation 19 stage you are not being asked whether you like the plan in general terms. You are being asked whether specific policies are legally sound. Vague objections carry little weight. Submissions that identify a specific policy, explain why it fails the soundness test, and suggest a remedy are the ones that land with the Inspector.
That distinction matters. General frustration will not stop a bad policy. A well-argued, specific representation might.
The plan covers the period to 2041 and covers the full range of planning policy: housing numbers, design standards, transport, retail, climate, heritage, and more. Three areas have generated the sharpest debate.
Housing Numbers
Kingston is under significant government pressure to plan for a substantial number of new homes. The borough's housing target under the standard method is a major driver of where and how development is directed across the plan period. How Kingston has responded to that target — and whether its proposed supply genuinely meets it — is one of the key questions the Inspector will probe. Residents should examine whether the plan's housing trajectory is realistic, and whether the infrastructure to support new homes is genuinely committed or merely aspirational.
Tall Buildings
The draft plan identifies specific locations where tall buildings — generally accepted in London planning terms as 10 storeys and above — may be considered acceptable. These include areas around Kingston town centre and parts of the borough with good transport links. Critics argue the identified zones are too broadly drawn and lack sufficient design safeguards. Supporters say density near transport is the logical alternative to sprawl. The question for residents is whether the policy wording is tight enough to prevent poor-quality tall development in sensitive locations.
Green Belt and the Hook Park Question
This publication has previously covered the proposed Hook Park development in Chessington — a scheme that would bring around 2,000 homes to green belt land. The Local Plan is the policy framework that either enables or constrains proposals like this. Whether, and on what terms, the draft plan proposes releasing green belt land is one of the most politically charged questions in the entire document. Residents who have views on this need to engage at this stage, not at individual planning applications later.
Kingston Council is not operating from a position of financial comfort. Budget papers for 2026/27 set out a projected four-year budget gap of £18 million under the Medium Term Financial Strategy. Council reserves stand at £14.2 million. An adopted Local Plan reduces planning uncertainty, can attract developer contributions through Section 106 agreements and the Community Infrastructure Levy, and makes it harder for speculative applications to succeed on appeal. An up-to-date plan is also a legal requirement — without one, the borough is more exposed to appeals by developers citing the so-called "tilted balance" in national planning policy.
In other words, the council has real incentives to get this plan through quickly and with minimal modifications. That is not a criticism — it is context. It means scrutiny from residents and the Planning Inspectorate is more important, not less.
With 48 councillors across 19 wards, and full council elections having taken place on 7 May 2026, the political composition of Kingston Council has been refreshed. That matters here. The Local Plan was developed under the previous administration's direction, and newly elected councillors — whatever their party — will need to own its contents going forward. If your ward councillor campaigned on planning issues, now is the time to hold them to those commitments.
Submissions must be made through Kingston Council's official consultation portal before the deadline. The council is required to forward all representations to the Planning Inspectorate. Here is how to make your submission count:
Be specific. Reference the policy number or paragraph you are challenging. "I don't like tall buildings" is not a representation. "Policy DM5 fails the soundness test because it does not define height thresholds with sufficient precision" is.
Use the soundness tests. The four tests are: justified (backed by evidence), effective (deliverable), positively prepared (meets objectively assessed needs), and consistent with national policy. Frame your objection around at least one of these.
Suggest a remedy. Tell the Inspector what the policy should say instead. Representations that simply object without offering an alternative carry less weight at examination.
Keep a copy. Save or print your submission confirmation. You may be invited to speak at the examination hearings.
Check the deadline. The submission window is time-limited. Do not assume you can submit the day after it closes — late representations are not accepted by the Inspectorate. Check the council's consultation portal at kingston.gov.uk for the exact closing date and time.
Regulation 19 is not a dry procedural exercise. It is one of the very few moments in the planning system when ordinary residents can formally shape policy — not just respond to a specific application, but challenge the rules by which all applications will be judged for the next 15 years.
The tall buildings question, the green belt question, the housing numbers question: these will all be settled by this plan. Once the Inspector signs it off, the debate largely closes.
The time to engage is now — not when the crane arrives.
Want to make your voice heard on Kingston's Local Plan? Use Council Clarity to message your ward councillors directly. Ask them which policies they support, which they have reservations about, and what they will do to represent your concerns at examination. Find your councillors and send a message at Council Clarity. It takes two minutes and puts your views on the record.
Share this post
Want to have your say on this issue?
Contact your local councillor through Council Clarity. Your message becomes a public thread.
Message your councillor →Got a parking ticket in Kingston? Here's exactly how to challenge it — from the 14-day discount window to the independent Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
explainerKingston has 19 wards and 48 councillors. Do you know who yours are — and what they're actually responsible for? Here's your complete guide.
explainer48 councillors, 19 wards, a £2,608.12 council tax bill and an £18M budget gap. Here's how Kingston Council actually works — and how you can influence it.